跨文化交际(23242英语/翻译专业)

要文静范京晶高安阳

目录

  • 1 Culture
    • 1.1 Course introduction
    • 1.2 Case Study
      • 1.2.1 Shanxi Pasta Culture
    • 1.3 Culture
      • 1.3.1 Cultural Confidence
    • 1.4 Differences between Chinese culture and western culture
  • 2 Communication
    • 2.1 Comunication
      • 2.1.1 10 Barriers to Effective Communication
    • 2.2 Case study
  • 3 Intercultural Communication
    • 3.1 Intercultural Communication
    • 3.2 Case study
  • 4 Hofstede’s Culture
    • 4.1 Individualism and Collectivism
    • 4.2 Power distance
    • 4.3 Uncertainty Avoidance
    • 4.4 Anna and King
    • 4.5 Let's deal with China - Intercultural communication
    • 4.6 masculinity ve femininity
  • 5 Kluckhohn and Strodtbeck’s Model
    • 5.1 Case study
    • 5.2 Man and Nature
  • 6 Cultural Connotation in Language
    • 6.1 作业视频分析与展播
    • 6.2 Language and Culture
    • 6.3 Case study
  • 7 Norms of social Interaction
    • 7.1 Verbal communication
    • 7.2 Addressing
    • 7.3 Gratitude
    • 7.4 Taboos
    • 7.5 Case study
  • 8 Non-verbal Communication
    • 8.1 Case Study
    • 8.2 Nonverbal language
    • 8.3 How to Read Body Language
  • 9 Ethnocentrism and Stereotypes
    • 9.1 Case study
    • 9.2 Ethnocentrism
    • 9.3 Race discrimination
    • 9.4 Stereotypes
  • 10 Acculturation and Identity
    • 10.1 Acculturation
    • 10.2 Identity
    • 10.3 Case study
  • 11 Culture Shock
    • 11.1 Case study
    • 11.2 Culture shock
    • 11.3 Ethnocentrism
    • 11.4 Reverse Culture Shock
  • 12 Education
    • 12.1 Chinese education
    • 12.2 Western education
    • 12.3 Case Study
  • 13 Hall’s Culture Context Model
    • 13.1 Case study
    • 13.2 low context and High context
    • 13.3 Compliment
    • 13.4 Face-Negotiation Theory
  • 14 Family and Gender
    • 14.1 Case study
    • 14.2 Gender
    • 14.3 Wedding and Funeral customs
  • 15 Intercultural business
    • 15.1 Case study
    • 15.2 Business Negotiation
  • 16 Globalization
    • 16.1 Economic Globalization
    • 16.2 Political Globalization
    • 16.3 Cultural Globalization
  • 17 参考章节Customs and Festivals
    • 17.1 Chinese festivals
    • 17.2 Western festivals
    • 17.3 Chinese cuisine
    • 17.4 Western cuisine
Power distance

Powerdistance is the extent to which the lowerranking individuals of a society "accept and expect that power isdistributed unequally". It is primarily used in psychological andsociological studies on societal management of inequalities between individuals,and individual's perceptions of that management. Peoplein societies with a high power distance are more likely to conform to ahierarchy where "everybody has a place and which needs no furtherjustification". Insocieties with a low power distance, individuals tend to try to distributepower equally. In such societies, inequalities of power among people wouldrequire additional justification.

Power Distance This dimension measures asociety's emphasis on human inequalities. A culture high in power distancewould value hierarchicalstatus and authority. Members at the lowerlevels of such a society, or an organization within it, tend to accept theirsubordinate status, and they are expected to conform to authority enjoyed bymembers in superior positions. Figure 1 illustrates a continuum of high and lowpower orientations.Hofstedefound that Mexico,Indonesia, Pakistan, India, and Japan,among others, scored high in power distance. In these societies,people respect formal hierarchical authority, and employees seldom violatechains of command or openly question decisions by their superiors. In contrast,countries that scoredlow on power distance included Australia, New Zealand, the UnitedStates, Denmark, and Finland. Inthese cultures, superiors and subordinates feel relatively comfortable withshared decision making and decentralization. Employees are not expected torigidly conform to authority, and people leave a certain latitude fordisagreement.